Articulate · Fair investigations · The audit trail

Sources — every claim, traceable to a primary source

Organised by page. Primary literature throughout — peer-reviewed journals, named clinicians, official agency reports. Contested findings flagged. Funding conflicts flagged. Editorial weaknesses listed at the bottom — what the site does not yet have, and what would strengthen it.

A note on sources

Every numeric and propositional claim on the addictions microsite is sourced from this page. The hierarchy of evidence used: Cochrane reviews and large RCTs first; multi-cohort meta-analyses next; named-author primary papers in major journals (NEJM, BMJ, Lancet, JAMA, Nature, PLoS, Annual Review); official agency reports (WHO, NIAAA, NIDA, EMCDDA, NICE, OHID, IAS, ASH, IFS); think-tank and advocacy papers (IEA, Frontier Economics, TBI, McKinsey, Resolution Foundation) cited with funding source disclosed; and books by named authorities with publication date. Newspaper and magazine pieces appear only where they aggregate primary work or where they are themselves the editorial position being characterised (Spiked).

Pathway sources

The shared circuit and the dopamine system

Rat Park — environment as cause

Wanting vs liking — Berridge incentive-sensitization

Allostasis — Koob's opponent-process

D2 downregulation — Volkow imaging

Set-point physiology — Leibel / Rosenbaum / Hirsch

Alcohol

Opioids

Food — Yale Food Addiction Scale and UPFA

Pornography — DSM/ICD position

Mental toll

Costs sources

UK / NHS — alcohol

UK / NHS — obesity

Tobacco

Opioids — US cost-of-illness

Snowdon / IEA

van Baal — the lifetime-cost finding

Opposing case — Sheron, Gilmore, Lancet Commission, ASH, BMA, RCP

Global cost-per-class

Tirzepatide — efficacy, mortality, side-effect data

Actuarial — life-years lost to obesity / hypertension

Weight stigma — Tomiyama, Puhl

Treatments sources

Managed Alcohol Programs

Portugal — decriminalisation arc

RCT and meta-evidence base

Policy sources

Industry & political-economy sources

Shellenberger — San Fransicko and the addiction industrial complex

Narconon / Foundation for a Drug-Free World — the religious-cover case

US 28-day rehab / Minnesota Model — evidence vs market dominance

Public-policy base rate — the 90% fails challenge

Structural intervention sources

Iceland — Planet Youth

Medellín — social urbanism

UK structural interventions — smoking, sugar, alcohol

Gambling page sources

The disease frame — pathway, machine zone, neuroscience

The cost — Lancet Public Health Commission on Gambling

US sports betting — post-PASPA market and harm signal

Prediction markets — Polymarket, Kalshi, the federalism battle

The kid-side pipeline — loot boxes to options trading

Treatments and policy

The polemicist — Rob Davies

Countries page sources

France — primary-care buprenorphine

Switzerland — heroin-assisted treatment

Portugal — decriminalisation

The expert voices — quoted within the panel and pathway

Chris Snowdon

Carl Hart

Maia Szalavitz

Marc Lewis

Nora Volkow

The peer-reviewed in-house critique

Editorial flags & honest gaps

What the site does not yet have, by category:

Any reader wanting to push back on a specific claim is invited to do so by reference to the primary source. The site is a defended thesis; the defence stops at the evidence, and the evidence is on this page.

Argue with this.

The thesis is contested by design. Two ways in.

Margin notes

Highlight any line, drop a note in the rail.

Select any sentence. A bubble opens in the right margin. Free Hypothesis account; team reviewers switch the group dropdown from Public to Articulate.

Page-level

Or argue down here, in the open.

One thread per page, indexed by Google, threaded by GitHub Discussions. Sign in with your GitHub to comment.