Yes. And the policy frame that pretends otherwise has produced forty years of failed campaigns.
The brain circuit is settled science — discovered in a rat by accident in 1954, mapped in detail by the 1990s, photographed in pathological gamblers and cocaine users by the 2000s. The clinical label addiction is sometimes earned and sometimes not; distinguishing the two is the whole job. The campaign frame that says the answer is character has produced school programmes that increase drug use, sin taxes that hit the addicted twice, prison-as-treatment that kills its alumni in the first fortnight after release, and a rehab industry whose dominant model has the weakest evidence base in modern medicine. The site reads the evidence and names which reading wins on which case.
Pick a way in
Start at the beginning.
The page that asks the question is the Prologue — how I got here. The page that fully voices the other side is the Steelman — the willpower-and-education position before any of mine. Then the Pathway for the science.
It isn't cheating. Here's why.
The science of why your body fights the diet is on Pathway · set-point. The argument over whether the medication is cheating runs through Costs · Mounjaro and Treatments · obesity. Insulin isn't cheating. Naltrexone isn't either.
What works, and what the regulator chose not to do.
Individual-level treatments that work — and don't: Treatments. The forty-year policy audit: Policy. Country-level cases — Portugal, France 1995, Switzerland: Countries. For gambling specifically: Gambling. For the US: America.
The four pages you'll argue with.
Begin with Structural — Iceland, Medellín, the meta-pattern. Then Policy — what DARE, Just Say No, sin taxes actually delivered. Then The Untaken Lever — five drugs that close ~6% of global disease burden. Then The Leaders — what the chemistry did to the men who wrote the policy.
If you have an hour and a half, this is the route.
- PrologueA row about Mounjaro at a kitchen table — how the site started.
- The SteelmanThe willpower-and-education position, fully voiced.
- The PathwayThe circuit, the four frames, the contested cases.
- GamblingThe cleanest test of the structural frame — Mike at eleven, eighteen, twenty-six.
- PolicyTwelve campaigns. Same frame. Same failure.
- The LeadersWhose neurochemistry was in the room when the decisions were made.
- The CultureTwo hundred years of writers, eighty of films, sixty of records — culture is the audit.
Argue with this.
The thesis is contested by design. Two ways in.
Highlight any line, drop a note in the rail.
Select any sentence. A bubble opens in the right margin. Free Hypothesis account; team reviewers switch the group dropdown from Public to Articulate.
Or argue down here, in the open.
One thread per page, indexed by Google, threaded by GitHub Discussions. Sign in with your GitHub to comment.